version 2019-08-28

NOTE: THIS SYLLABUS IS A LIVING DOCUMENT. THE READING LIST WILL BE ADJUSTED AS WE GO.

Image of brain and neuron HPS 2634 Topics in Philosophy of Cognitive Science: Cognitive Models

Fall 2019 Schedule and Syllabus
Meeting time: M 9:30-12; CL 1008C

Instructor

(Prof.) Colin Allen <colin.allen@pitt.edu>
Office: CL 1109H
Office hours: T 1:45-2:45 and W 2-3 (and by appointment)

Course Description

This seminar will address the diversity of modeling approaches used in the cognitive sciences: mathematical, computational, Bayesian, dynamical, network models, etc. We will cover issues such as the relationship of cognitive models to neuroscience, and questions about the nature and significance of distinctions among models such as cognitive vs. associative, dynamical vs. computational, optimal vs. heuristic. These topics will lead us to more general issues concerning the epistemic and explanatory status of cognitive models, pragmatism in modeling choices, and methods for evaluating models.

There will be maths! (But we will work through it together.) (And see Additional Resources below the schedule.)

Consider four ways in which our reading could be organized:
  1. Technical (cf., chapter headings in the text book: qualitative model comparisons, parameter estimation, quantitive model comparisons, hierarchical modeling)
  2. Historical (origins in psychophysics and learning theory, main contributors, societies, etc.)
  3. Typological (serial, parallel, rational, connectionist, dynamical, causal, bayesian, etc.)
  4. Applications (concept learning, decision making, etc.)
In this course, we will be trying to build solid foundations in the first that recognize the context provided by the second, and help us to understand the debates surrounding the third. My goal is not to weigh in on specific issues in the last category, but those will inevitably come up as we address the others. We are not aiming for a comprehensive view of any application domain, but aiming instead to give you the tools to understand what's at stake in those debates and how modelers have attempted to address shortcomings in less formal approaches to them.

Course Objectives

Aside from acquiring the necessary background in cognitive modeling, the main goal of this seminar is for you to develop a research paper on any philosophical issue raised during the course. You will write a proposal, draft, engage peer reviews, and the final paper. You will also be asked to give at least one presentation based on the reading list, and you will also give a presentation based on your developing research ideas during the last month of the course.

Texts

  1. Book: Busemeyer and Diederich 2010 Cognitive Modeling Sage Publishing.
  2. Additional readings provided electronically from the pool at Blackboard Candidate Readings. Once assigned they will be moved to the folder at Blackboard Assigned Readings

Both Blackboard folders mentioned just above are also accessible from the "Course Documents" menu item on the left. New items will be added to the hopper as we go.

Schedule of Readings and Presentations

We are going to adjust this as we go along.

NOTE: SOMETIMES LINKS BREAK. IF SOMETHING CAN'T BE REACHED, PLEASE LET ME KNOW IMMEDIATELY.

DateTopicReading Assignments
Mon 08/26 Overview •Busemeyer et al. 2015 "Review of Basic Mathematical Concepts Used in Computational and Mathematical Psychology" •Sternberg 1966 "High-Speed Scanning in Human Memory"
Mon 09/07 Getting started: Modeling basics, some history, and a skeptical take from comparative animal cognition •Busemeyer & Diederich Chapters 1 and 2
•Link (2015) "Psychophysical Theory and Laws, History of"
Mon 09/16 Model comparison • Busemeyer & Diederich Chapter 2
•Luce (1995) "Four Tensions Concerning Mathematical Modeling in Psychology"
• Nosofsky & Zaki (2002) "Exemplar and Prototype Models Revisited"
•Smith et al. (2016) "Formal models in animal-metacognition research: the problem of interpreting animals’ behavior"
Mon 09/23 Parameter estimation • Busemeyer & Diederich Chapter 3
Mon 09/30
Mon 10/07
Mon 10/14
Mon 10/21
Mon 10/28
Mon 11/04
Mon 11/11 Instructor & student research presentations • Weinberger & Allen (in prep) working title:"Team continuous vs. team discrete"
Mon 11/18 Student research presentations
Mon 12/02 Student research presentations

Additional Resources

If you want some exceptionally clear, wonderfully animated, and often humorous introductions/refreshers for some of the mathematics we'll be faced with, I highly recommend the videos put out by Grant Sanderson, aka 3blue1brown. The following are particularly relevant as we get further into the course: And although it's got nothing to do with the course, this one is a wonderful illustration of the style: This problem seems hard...

Statement for Students with Disabilities
The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) is a federal anti-discrimination statute that provides comprehensive civil rights protection for persons with disabilities. Among other things, this legislation requires that all students with disabilities be guaranteed a learning environment that provides for reasonable accommodation of their disabilities. If you believe you have a disability requiring an accommodation, please visit Pitt Student Affairs Disability Resources and Services for further information.