version 2013-01-02
COGS Q540 Philosophical Foundations of Cognitive Science
Spring 2013 Schedule and Syllabus
Meeting time: MW 2:30-3:45; Location: PY 113
Instructor
(Prof.) Colin Allen
<colallen@indiana.edu>
Offices: Goodbody Hall 113 and Eigenmann 802
Office hours: Wednesdays after CogLunch until class (location tba), and by appointment
Course Description
The cognitive sciences began with great enthusiasm for the prospects of a successful multi-disciplinary attack on the mind. This enthusiasm was fueled by the faith that computational ideas could put flesh on abstract notions of mental representation, providing the means to make good physical sense of questions about the nature of mental information processing. The challenges of understanding how minds work have turned out to be much greater than many of the early enthusiasts predicted — in fact they have turned out to be so great that many (especially here at IU) have argued that we need new paradigms to replace the standard computationalist-representationalist assumptions of traditional cognitive science. This course aims to provide an understanding of the philosophical issues underlying this discussion and to apply this understanding to a specific cutting edge topic. For Spring 2013 that issue will be the question of where theories of information fit into cognitive science.
Texts
Course Objectives
By the end of this course you should have broad knowledge of the history, philosophy, and major concepts and trends in cognitive science, along with an appreciation for the philosophical issues that motivated the emergence of cognitive science and underlie the controversies within it. By the end of the course you should have the ability to read works written for professional academic cognitive scientists and philosophers of cognitive science, and to summarize them accurately both orally and in writing using your own words. You should also be able to relate foundational issues in cognitive science to your own research interests.
Grading Basis
Grades will be based holistically on overall performance in the following five categories:
* Weekly reaction pieces. Delivery: via Piazza (see below). In these short reaction pieces, identify which items you have read from the reading list for the previous two preceding class periods, and write a 200-300-word reaction to at least one of them. This should not be a summary or restatement of the reading. Rather, write an argumentative response to something you read. State what you liked or disliked most about the idea(s) and why, with special attention to the strength of the arguments that were presented. (See calendar below for due dates.)
This semester we will be trying out Piazza for extended class discussion. The system is designed for getting help fast and efficiently from classmates and myself. Rather than emailing questions to me directly I encourage you to post your questions on Piazza. If you have any problems or feedback for the developers, email team@piazza.com. Find our class page at: https://piazza.com/iub/spring2013/cogsq540/home.
** All students will be scheduled to give TWO classroom presentations: (1) on an assigned reading, 15 minutes maximum, which like the reaction pieces should not be a linear summary of the reading, but in which you should identify and evaluate an argument contained in the piece; and (2) you will be scheduled in the week of Mar 25 to give a 5 minute presentation of your proposed paper topic for the course.
*** This is a discussion-oriented class. If you do not speak up regularly during class discussions, you may also be gauged by an oral exam to be scheduled at the instructor's discretion during finals week. Your activity on Piazza in raising and responding to questions and reaction pieces there will also be considered.
Schedule of Readings and Presentations
Articles for the first part of the semester are available to you via the links below for your personal use under fair use doctrine. Items preceded with bullets "•" are required readings; items preceded with daggers "†" are suggested optional readings. Book chapters from Floridi are F#. This schedule may be altered in response to events in class.
Date | Topic | Reading Assignments | Writing Assignments, etc. |
---|---|---|---|
Week 1 | |||
Jan 07 | Organization and Overview | ||
Jan 09 | Cognitive Prehistory |
• Descartes Meditations I & II (alt. version: pdf) • Hume Enquiry section 2 and section 3 • Tolman (1948) html pdf | Reaction1 due |
Week 2 | |||
Jan 14 | Beyond Behaviorism |
• Chomsky (1959/1967) html pdf • Shepard & Metzler (1971) jstor pdf • Goldstone & Kersten (2003) pdf † [Vigo (2010) pdf] | |
Jan 16 | Turing Machines, Functionalism, & Computational Theory of Mind |
• "Turing Machine" article at Wikipedia or SEP • SEP "Computational Theory of Mind" html † [Clark 1] | Reaction2 due |
Jan 17 | AI as Empirical Enquiry (or not) |
rescheduled from 1/23 • Newell & Simon (1975) pdf • Schank & Abelson (1995) pdf † [Clark 2] † [Schank & Abelson (1977) pdf] | reaction piece not due until next week |
Week 3 | |||
Jan 21 | MLK Day | No Class | |
Jan 23* | rescheduled to 1/17 | Reaction3 due | |
Week 4 | |||
Jan 28 | Turing Test & Chinese Room |
• Turing (1950) html pdf • Searle (1980) preprint pdf | |
Jan 30 | Cognition and Neural Realization |
• Marr (1981) pdf • Figdor (2010) pdf † [Clark 3] † [SEP "Multiple Realizability" html] | Reaction4 due |
Week 5 | |||
Feb 04 | Instrumentalism & Rational Believers |
• Dennett (1981) pdf • Tversky & Kahneman (1974) jstor pdf • Todd & Gigerenzer (2007) pdf | **COGS colloquium: Edouard Machery (philosopher) on doing away with concepts** |
Feb 06 | Eliminativism and Connectionism |
• Pollack (1989) pdf • Ramsey et al. (1991) jstor pdf • Churchland 2005 preprint pdf † [SEP "Connectionism" html] † [Clark 4] † [Play with Backprop simulator] | Reaction5 due |
Week 6 | |||
Feb 11 | Embodiment |
• Brooks (1991) pdf • Clark (1998) pdf • Barsalou, Smith & Breazeal (2006) pdf † [Clark 5] | |
Feb 13 | Dynamical Systems |
• Van Gelder (1995) pdf • Beer (2000) pdf • Silberstein & Chemero (2008) pdf † [Clark 6 & 7] | Reaction6 due |
Week 7 | |||
Feb 18 | Extended Mind |
• Clark & Chalmers (1998) pdf • Adams & Aizawa 2010 pdf • Rupert 2009 pdf | |
Feb 20 | Information and Animal Communication |
• Owren, Rendall, & Ryan (2010) pdf • Seyfarth et al. (2011) pdf • Allen (in press) pdf † [Shannon (1956) pdf] † [Vigo (2013) pdf] | Reaction7 due |
Week 8 | |||
Feb 25 | "What is the philosophy of information?" | • F1 | |
Feb 27* | "Open problems in the philosophy of information" |
rescheduled class time tba • F2 | Reaction8 due Final paper requirements will be discussed |
Week 9 | |||
Mar 04 | "The method of levels of abstraction" | • F3 | |
Mar 06 | "Semantic information and the veridicality thesis" | • F4 | Reaction9 due |
Week of Spring Break | |||
Mar 11 | spring break | no class meeting | |
Mar 13 | spring break | no class meeting | |
Week 10 | |||
Mar 18* | "Outline of a theory of strongly semantic information" |
rescheduled class time tba • F5 | Paper proposal due COGS colloquium |
Mar 20* | "The symbol-grounding problem" |
rescheduled class time tba • F6 | |
Week 11 | |||
Mar 25 | Presentation of paper topics | ||
Mar 27* | Presentation of paper topics |
rescheduled class time tba | COGS colloquium |
Week 12 | |||
Apr 01 | "Action-based semantics" | • F7 | COGS colloquium |
Apr 03 | "Semantic information and the correctness theory of truth" | • F8 | Paper draft due |
Week 13 | |||
Apr 08 | "The logical unsolvability of the Gettier problem" | • F9 | COGS colloquium |
Apr 10 | "The logic of being informed" | • F10 | |
Week 14 | |||
Apr 15 | "Understanding epistemic relevance" | • F11 | COGS colloquium |
Apr 17 | "Semantic information and the network theory of account" | • F12 | Reaction10 due |
Week 15 | |||
Apr 22 | "Consciousness, agents, and the knowledge game", "Against digital ontology" |
• F13 • F14 | COGS colloquium |
Apr 24 | "A defence of informational structural realism" | • F15 | |
Finals Week | |||
May 01 | Final paper due |
Statement for Students with Disabilities
The
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) is a federal anti-discrimination
statute that provides comprehensive civil rights protection for
persons with disabilities. Among other things, this legislation
requires that all students with disabilities be guaranteed a learning
environment that provides for reasonable accommodation of their
disabilities. If you believe you have a disability requiring an
accommodation, please contact IU Disability
Services for Students.
Statement about Academic Misconduct
University rules concerning academic misconduct will be
rigorously enforced in this class. See IU Code of Ethics, Part II for details.