http://mypage.iu.edu/~colallen/Courses/Q101/index.shtml —
version 2013-08-27
COGS Q101 — Introduction to Cognitive Science
— Fall "Themester" 2013
Meeting times and locations: Student Building 150 Tu-Th 5:45-6:35; F discussion sections as enrolled
- Co-Instructors
- Paul Williams, Visiting Assistant Professor,
Program in Cognitive Science
- <plw@indiana.edu>
- Office hours, Thursdays at tba, Eigenmann 841, and by appointment
-
- Colin Allen, Professor,
Dept. of History & Philosophy of Science and Program in Cognitive Science
- <colallen@indiana.edu>
- Office hours, Monday 11-12 in Goodbody 113, and by appointment
- Asst. Instructor
- Emel Gencer, PhD Student, Program in Cognitive Science
- egencer@indiana.edu
- Office hours, Tuesdays 3-4 in Eigenmann 806 and by appointment
Cognitive Science is the study of how minds work. Cognitive
scientists come together from many different research areas to engage
in an interdisciplinary attack on the nature of intelligence, memory,
attention, imagery, language, reasoning and perception. One way to
see why studying mind is a difficult problem is to consider that in
virtually every other discipline we use our minds to study something
else. In cognitive science the mind is studying itself; we have to
use our own thought processes to study those processes. Because this
is such a difficult endeavor, we come at the problem from multiple
directions, which is why cognitive science spans psychology,
neuroscience, computer science, logic, philosophy, mathematics,
sociology, anthropology, behavioral economics, robotics, linguistics,
and animal learning (to mention just a few of the areas involved).
This course will provide you with an overview of the tools and
theories that bring these different areas together and provides a
common framework for sharing data across disciplines. You will be
introduced to the more important results obtained so far, and begin to
understand how cognitive scientists discover the laws, models, and
mechanisms that allow them to explain how complex minds produce
complex behavior.
The Fall 2013 edition relates in several ways to the 2013
"Themester": Connectedness We will look at empirical research by
psychologists, neuroscientists, and even experimental philosophersq,
who are attempting to discover the processes and mechanisms underlying
the cognition and behavior of people, at individual and collective levels.
By the end of the course, you should have gained
important new insights into what you are and how you work!
Course Objectives
This course has two main goals:
- Content: For you to learn about the theories, methods, and results
in cognitive science and about the intellectual and historical
context which makes some aspects of the field controversial. To
introduce you to some of the specific research going on in the Cognitive Science Program at
IU.
- Skills: To help you develop general scientific literacy,
reasoning, and study skills that are foundational for success in a
wide range of college courses. To prepare you to take more advanced
courses in cognitive science. To help you understand the real-world
applications of cognitive science and to become critical consumers of
media reports of cognitive science.
Readings
Because every introductory cognitive science textbook tends to be
biased towards its author's home discipline, I prefer to use a set of
readings drawn from many different sources. These will be made
available to you through
OnCourse links. Many of the
readings come from the primary research literature in cognitive
science. This is a good thing, since they will help to capture the
vitality and excitement of scientific discovery. (Some of this work
hasn't yet filtered into textbooks.) These readings may also be
challenging, though, and they will often use terms and refer to ideas
with which you are unfamiliar. Don’t be discouraged by this! Though
the readings have been carefully chosen to be accessible, we don’t
expect you to fully understand every aspect of the readings. That is
why the readings come with instructors whose job it is to help you
understand the difficult bits. You can help us help you by diligently
doing the readings (see also the grading basis) and coming to class
ready to ask questions. Overall, we think
you’ll get more out of reading the primary literature in this way than
by reading the watered-down and less exciting secondary literature,
although some secondary material is included to help provide
background.
Attendance policy
This is not grade school, so attendance will not be officially
enforced. However, some materials collected from classroom activities
will be used to track your attendance, and because there is no text
book and no official lecture notes, you will need to come to class to
learn the material. You cannot expect to do well without coming to
class. In all cases of absence, excused or unexcused, it is your
responsibility to get missed notes and information from a classmate.
Examinations will not be limited only to material from the readings,
but will also cover concepts discussed in the classroom at both
the main lectures and discussion sections.
- You may request to make up for missed exams or other assignments
only for University-recognized officially excused absences:
- • For predictable absences due to competitive events,
required activities in other classes, etc., documentation must be
provided at least two weeks prior to the absence.
- • For genuine emergencies, illnesses, or deaths in the family,
written documentation must be provided when you return to
class.
- • Accommodation for religious observances will be handled
according to the official
policy. (Note that the form
must be submitted by the student by the end of the second week
of the semester.)
Study habits
A load of 12 credit hours is officially defined as full time, but
you are expected to maintain a 15 hr schedule each semester for a
4-year degree plan. A full time work week is 40 hrs, which averages to
just under 3 hrs per week per credit. (If you take an overload, then
it is your responsibility to do the overtime!)
For a 3-credit course, 150 minutes are spent in the classroom, which
means typically two to three times that much should be spent outside studying and
carrying out course assignments. Individuals' study effectiveness
varies, and you may need (or hopefully want!) to do more than the
minimum to do well in the course. And, of course, the amount of
reward you get out of your education is a function of how much effort
you put in.
For this course you should estimate about 40% of your outside of classroom
time will be devoted to the assigned readings, 20% to independent
reading and research, and 40% to carrying out assignments or studying
for tests (this last category will have the highest variation from
week to week).
IU offers excellent help with academic skill development through
courses for credit and free workshops provided by the Student Academic
Center. Whether you are struggling with specific deadlines, or
simply wanting to improve your general skills, the Center has
something to offer.
For those of you new to IU (and even for some that aren't) this guide to making the
transition to College from SMU will help you understand my
expectations. Regardless of where you are in your College experience,
you should be interested in this NY
Times article on the cognitive science of learning.
Grading Basis
- (20%) Responses to Reading
To get the most out of this course, it is essential that you carefully
and critically study the readings associated with each lecture.
Each reading is accompanied by an overview piece that is intended to
help you with some of the concepts and terminology you will encounter
in the main reading.
These overviews are not substitutes for the reading -- they
do not attempt to summarize the main readings, and in fact they are
designed to be quite generic so that they would help you to read any
article in the same sub-area of cognitive science.
To encourage you to carefully and critically study the readings, and
to give the instructor feedback as to what you thought of the
supplementary material, you will be asked to provide comments on the
readings for each class.
You will be required to complete these via OnCourse no later than noon
on the day of the class in which that reading will be discussed.
These should take no longer than 15 minutes to complete after you have
read the material.
The questions due for each class will be assigned at the end of the
previous class.
We will use these comments to gauge your reactions to (and
understanding of) the ideas we’ll discuss, and will occasionally part
of the classroom time responding to some of the issues you raise in
these comments, as well as working them into the weekly discussion
sections.
Note that a significant portion of your grade (20%) will be based on
simply completing these assignments, and that late submissions will
not be counted for any reason except documented medical emergencies.
These will be graded on a pass/fail (1/0) basis and for full credit
you need to have 20 passes from the 24 opportunities during the
semester (i.e. you can skip or drop 4).
- (55%) Two Exams
55% of your course grade will be determined by two examinations. The
first exam will be on Thursday, October 10 and will cover material
from August 21 through October 3.
The second exam will be held on the officially
scheduled final date of Tuesday, December 17, from 7:15 p.m. to
9:15 p.m. and will cover material from the remainder of the course.
The exam on which you do the best will count for 30% of your
grade; the other will count for 25%.
The format of these exams will be described in class.
Make-up exams will be given only in exceptional circumstances, and in
all cases may involve completely new questions, possibly in other
formats. (Advice: you really want to avoid having to take a make-up
exam.)
To do well on these exams, you’ll have to attend the lectures —
especially since readings and lectures will rarely overlap by more
than ~ 25%.
- (20%) Short Paper You will be required to write one
short (3-5 page) paper for this course, on an assigned topic which
is discussed further below in this syllabus.
This paper is due no later than midnight on Sunday, December 2nd, just
before the last week of class. As part of this assignment you are
also required to submit a paper proposal.
- (5%) Class participation Various activities during
main lecture and discussion sections will entail you turning in a
piece of paper or index card. These will be aggregated during the
semester and assessed at the end of the semester according to your
engagement with the classroom activities.
- (+5%) Themester: Extra Credit Up to 10 extra points
are available by participating in designated Themester events. These
opportunties will be explained in class.
Schedule
Note: Readings and topics are only definite 3 weeks before the date.
All readings will be made
available via OnCourse
(login required).
Date | Topic | *Readings / +Assignments | Notes and Events |
Week 1 |
---|
Tu Aug 27 | Course introduction |
Suggested readings: transition to college and cognitive science of studying
| Themester orientation
|
Th Aug 29 | What is Cognitive Science? |
Overview doc 1
Thagard 2010 and
Wikipedia
|
|
Fr Aug 30 | Concept Maps | discussion sections |
|
Week 2 |
---|
Tu Sep 03 | Anatomy of an experimental report |
Overview doc 2 Roediger & Karpicke 2006
|
|
Th Sep 05 | Learning Processes |
Overview doc 3 Roediger & Karpicke 2006 (reread)
|
|
Fr Aug 31 | | discussion sections |
|
Week 3 |
---|
Tu Sep 10 | Stereotype Threat |
Overview doc 4
Rydell et al. 2010
| optional:Science News, July 2010
|
Th Sep 12 | Attention! |
Overview doc 5
Simons & Chabris 1999
| optional:Discover Magazine 2011
|
Fr Sep 07 | | discussion sections |
|
Week 4 |
---|
Tu Sep 17 | Turing Dreams: IBM Watson |
Overview doc 6
Ferrucci et al. 2010
| optional:NY Times, Feb 2011
|
Th Sep 19 | Computation: mind or model? |
Overview doc 7
Searle 1980
|
|
Fr Sep 20 | | discussion sections |
|
Week 5 |
---|
Tu Sep 24 | Modeling connections |
Overview doc 8
reading tbd
|
|
Th Sep 26 | EEG and Face Processing |
Overview doc 9
Carrick et al. 2007
|
|
Fr Sep 27 | | discussion sections |
|
Week 6 |
---|
Tu Oct 01 | Mapping the Connectome |
Overview doc 10
Sporns tbd
|
|
Th Oct 03 | Eye Contact and the Autistic Spectrum |
Overview doc 11
Pelphrey et al. 2002
|
|
Fr Oct 04 | | discussion sections |
|
Week 7 |
---|
Tu Oct 08 | Midterm review |
|
|
Th Oct 10 | Exam |
++MIDTERM EXAM
|
|
Fr Oct 11 | | discussion sections |
|
Week 8 |
---|
Tu Oct 15 | Please sir, can I have some more? |
Overview doc 12
Wansink et al.
| Optional: Scheibehenne et al. 2002a
|
Th Oct 17 | Human irrationality? |
Overview doc 13
Tversky & Kahnemann 1983
|
|
Fr Oct 18 | NO CLASS! | Fall break |
|
Week 9 |
---|
Tu Oct 22 | Evolved logic? |
Overview doc 14
Cosmides & Tooby 1997
|
|
Th Oct 24 | Heuristics & Rationality |
Overview doc 15
Gigerenzer & Todd 2007
|
|
Fr Oct 25 | | discussion sections |
|
Week 10 |
---|
Tu Oct 29 | Search inside and out |
Overview doc 16
Hills et al. 2008
|
|
Th Oct 31 | Self-knowledge in rats? |
Overview doc 17
Foote & Crystal 2007
|
|
Fr Nov 01 | | discussion sections |
|
Week 11 |
---|
Tu Nov 05 | A-not-B? |
Overview doc 18
Smith & Thelen 1999
|
|
Th Nov 07 | Throwing arms |
Overview doc 19
Zhu & Bingham 2011
|
|
Fr Nov 08 | | discussion sections |
|
Week 12 |
---|
Tu Nov 12 | Language and Number |
Overview doc 20
Frank et al. 2008
|
|
Th Nov 14 | Varieties of experience |
Overview doc 21
Brang et al. 2008
|
|
Fr Nov 15 | | discussion sections |
|
Week 13 |
---|
Tu Nov 19 | Social Networks, Group Cognition |
Overview doc 22
tba
|
|
Thu Nov 21 | Social Networks: Cowbirds |
Overview doc 23
Miller, West and King
|
|
Fr Nov 22 | | discussion sections
++PAPER Proposals due 5 p.m.
|
|
Week 14 |
---|
Tu Nov 26 | NO CLASS! | Thanksgiving break |
|
Th Nov 28 | NO CLASS! | Thanksgiving break |
|
Fr Nov 29 | NO CLASS! | Thanksgiving break |
|
Week 15 |
---|
Tu Dec 03 | Paper conferences |
by appointment |
|
Th Dec 05 | Paper conferences |
by appointment |
|
Fr Dec 06 | | discussion sections
|
|
Su Dec 08 | | ++PAPER due at midnight |
|
Week 16 |
---|
Tu Dec 10 | Weird people? |
Overview doc 24
Henrich et al. 2010 |
[Read sections 1-4 pages 1-14 for today]
|
Th Dec 12 | More Weird
| Henrich et al. 2010 |
[Read sections 5-7 pages 14-23 for today]
|
Fr Dec 13 | | discussion sections |
|
Finals Week |
---|
Tu Dec 17 | EXAM | +EXAM as scheduled | Final examination Tuesday 7:15-9:15 p.m. Note time/date!
|
Paper topic
When one asks about the "ecological validity" of a scientific study,
one is essentially asking "What does this tell us about the world
outside the lab?" It relates not only to whether the topic seems
important "in the real world", but also whether the specific
experiments that were done adequately reproduced the kinds of
conditions and tasks that are necessary for making strong inferences
about applications outside the laboratory. In this short (3-5 page)
paper, you’ll discuss the ecological validity of a part of cognitive
science, and compare an actual scientific report with its presentation
in the news media.
Choose any recent (past 10 years) example of peer-reviewed cognitive
science research which received press coverage in a major newspaper or
magazine -- e.g.
The New York Times,
The Guardian,
Scientific American,
Discover Magazine,
and
Wired.
(You may pick an example covered in class, or find
something else. See a list of IU cognitive
scientists in the news.)
Write a short (3-5 page, double-spaced)
paper in which you:
(a) summarize, in your own words, the main point, methods, and results
of the research as reported in the original scientific article;
(b) describe how this research was presented in one or more of the
journalistic treatments (did they report it accurately? did they use
language and concepts not in the original?);
(c) say whether the journalistic presentation and the scientific
presentation covered ecological validity of the research, and if so, how;
(d) give your own assessment of the ecological validity of this research;
(e) discuss what you would say to someone who disagrees with your assessment -- play ‘devil’s advocate’ to generate arguments for alternative views to your own, and then try to counter them.
Statement for Students with Disabilities
The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) is a Federal
anti-discrimination statute that provides comprehensive civil rights
protection for persons with disabilities. Among other things, this
legislation requires that all students with disabilities be guaranteed
a learning environment that provides for reasonable accommodation of
their disabilities. If you believe you have a disability requiring an
accommodation, please contact IU Disability Services for Students.
Acknowledgment
Portions of this syllabus are adapted with permission from Prof. Brian
Scholl's Introduction to Cognitive Science syllabus
at Yale University.
|