version 2016-01-12
NOTE: THIS VERSION OF THE SYLLABUS IS TENTATIVE AND WILL NOT BE FINALIZED UNTIL THE END OF THE FIRST WEEK OF CLASSES
COGS Q540 Philosophical Foundations of Cognitive Science
Spring 2016 Schedule and Syllabus
Meeting time: TR 1:00-2:15; Location: Ballantine (BH) 231
Instructor
(Prof.) Colin Allen
<colallen@indiana.edu>
Offices: Ballantine 654 (and Eigenmann 804)
Office hours: Tues 11-12 in BH 654, and by appointment
Course Description
The cognitive sciences began with great enthusiasm for the prospects of a successful multi-disciplinary attack on the mind. This enthusiasm was fueled by the faith that computational ideas could put flesh on abstract notions of mental representation, providing the means to make good physical sense of questions about the nature of mental information processing. The challenges of understanding how minds work have turned out to be much greater than many of the early enthusiasts predicted — in fact they have turned out to be so great that many (especially here at IU) have argued that we need new paradigms to replace the standard computationalist-representationalist assumptions of traditional cognitive science. This course aims to provide an understanding of the philosophical issues underlying this discussion and to apply this understanding to a specific cutting edge topic. For Spring 2016 that issue will be the question of human cognitive evolution and alleged uniqueness.
Texts
Course Objectives
By the end of this course you should have broad knowledge of the history, philosophy, and major concepts and programmatic trends in the philosophy of cognitive science, along with an appreciation for the philosophical issues that motivated the emergence of cognitive science and underlie the controversies within it. By the end of the course you should have the ability to read works written for professional academic cognitive scientists and philosophers of cognitive science, and to summarize them accurately both orally and in writing using your own words. You should also be able to relate foundational issues in cognitive science to your own research interests.
Grading Basis
Grades will be based holistically on overall performance in the following six categories:
* Weekly reaction pieces due before midnight on due dates (see calendar below). Electronic delivery preferred (all common formats can be handled), but paper delivery in class on Wednesday also acceptable. For Reactions 1-9, identify which items you have read from the reading list for that week, and write a short (250-400 word) reaction to at least one of them. This should not be a summary or restatement of the reading. Rather, write an argumentative response to something you read. State what you liked or disliked most about the idea(s) and why, with special attention to the strength of the arguments that were presented. For Reaction10, identify a journal in philosophy, cognitive science, or your primary field that does book reviews and write a short (1000-1200 word) review of Kristin Andrews' book in the style of that journal, highlighting the aspects of the book most relevant to researchers in that area.
** Three approaches to writing a paper for this class:
*** This is a discussion-oriented class. If you do not speak up regularly during class discussions, you may also be gauged by an oral exam to be scheduled at the instructor's discretion during finals week.
**** (This will happen only if discussion is not flowing in class.) Students should expect to give a classroom presentation on a particular aspect of an assigned reading at some point in the semester. The presentation should be organized for delivery in 15 minutes maximum, and like the reaction pieces should not be a linear summary of the reading, but in which you should identify and evaluate an argument contained in the piece.
Schedule of Readings and Presentations
Articles for the first part of the semester are available to you via the links below for your personal use under fair use doctrine. Items preceded with bullets "•" are required readings; items preceded with daggers "†" are suggested optional readings. S#: indicates chapters from the book by Sterelny. This schedule may be altered in response to events in class.
NOTE: I AM IN THE PROCESS OF MOVING FILES FROM ONE SERVER TO ANOTHER SO SOME OF THESE LINKS MAY NOT BE CORRECT -- PLEASE LET ME KNOW IF YOU FIND A BAD ONE.
Date | Topic | Reading Assignments | Writing Assignments, etc. |
---|---|---|---|
Week 1 | |||
Jan 13 | Organization and Overview | ||
Jan 15 | Cognitive Prehistory |
• Descartes selections from Discourse on Method • Hume Enquiry section 2 and section 3 • Tolman (1948) html pdf | Reaction1 due |
Week 2 | |||
Jan 19 | Beyond Behaviorism |
• Chomsky (1959/1967) html pdf • Shepard & Metzler (1971) jstor pdf or here • Skinner (1977) jstor | |
Jan 21 | Turing Machines, Functionalism, & Computational Theory of Mind |
• "Turing Machine" article at Wikipedia or SEP • SEP "Computational Theory of Mind" html † [Clark 1] | Reaction2 due |
Week 3 | |||
Jan 26 | AI as Empirical Enquiry (or not) |
• Newell & Simon (1975) pdf • Schank & Abelson (1977) pdf † [Clark 2] † [Schank & Abelson (1995) pdf] | |
Jan 28 | More concepts |
• Goldstone & Kersten (2003) pdf • Lawrence & Margolis (2011) SEP entry on Concepts † [Vigo (2010) pdf] | Reaction3 due |
Week 4 | |||
Feb 02 | Cognition ← → Brain? |
• Fodor (1974) pdf • Marr (1982) chapter 1 pdf and chapter 6 pdf • Figdor (2010) pdf † [Clark 3] † [SEP "Multiple Realizability" html] | |
Feb 04 | Turing Test & Chinese Room |
• Turing (1950) html pdf • Searle (1980) preprint pdf | Reaction4 due |
Week 5 | |||
Feb 09 | Instrumentalism & Rational Believers |
• Dennett (1981) pdf • Tversky & Kahneman (1974) jstor pdf • Todd & Gigerenzer (2007) pdf | |
Feb 11 | Connectionism and Eliminativism |
• Medler (1998) pdf • Ramsey et al. (1991) jstor pdf • Churchland 2005 preprint pdf † [SEP "Connectionism" html] † [Clark 4] † [Play with Backprop simulator] | Reaction5 due |
Week 6 | |||
Feb 16 | Embodiment |
• Brooks (1991) pdf • Clark (1998) pdf • Barsalou, Smith & Breazeal (2007) pdf † [Clark 5] | |
Feb 18 | Dynamical Systems |
• Van Gelder (1995) pdf • Beer (2000) pdf • Silberstein & Chemero (2008) pdf † [Clark 6 & 7] | Reaction6 due |
Week 7 | |||
Feb 23 | Extended and Collective Minds |
• Clark & Chalmers (1998) pdf • Adams & Aizawa 2010 pdf • Theiner et al. (2010) pdf | |
Feb 25 | Shared Intentions | Tomasello et al. (2005) pdf (read target article only, which ends on p.691) | Reaction7 due |
Week 8 | |||
Mar 01 | Language as Tool | Clark (2006) pdf | |
Mar 03 | Evolutionary Psychology | Cosmides & Tooby (1997) html | Reaction8 due |
Week 9 | |||
Mar 08 | Methodological Adaptationism | Lloyd (2015) pdf | |
Mar 10 | Preview of Sterelny | Preface to The Evolved Apprentice | Final paper requirements will be discussed |
Week of Spring Break | |||
Mar 15 | spring break | no class meeting | |
Mar 17 | spring break | no class meeting | |
Week 10 | |||
Mar 22 | The Challenge of Novelty | S1 | |
Mar 24 | Accumulating Cognitive Capital | S2 | |
Week 11 | |||
Mar 30 | Adapted Invidividuals, Adapted Environments | S3 | |
Apr 01 | The Human Cooperation Syndrome | S4 | Reaction9 due |
Week 12 | |||
Apr 05 | Costs and Commitments | S5 | |
Apr 07 | Signals, Cooperation, Learning | S6 | |
Week 13 | |||
Apr 12 | From Skills to Norms | S7 | |
Apr 14 | Skills to Norms cont'd | S7 | Reaction10 (book review) due |
Week 14 | |||
Apr 19 | Cooperation and Conflict | S8 | |
Apr 21 | tba | paper draft due | |
Week 15 | |||
Apr 26 | Paper workshops | ||
Apr 28 | Paper workshops | ||
Finals Week | |||
May 04 | Final paper due |
Statement for Students with Disabilities
The
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) is a federal anti-discrimination
statute that provides comprehensive civil rights protection for
persons with disabilities. Among other things, this legislation
requires that all students with disabilities be guaranteed a learning
environment that provides for reasonable accommodation of their
disabilities. If you believe you have a disability requiring an
accommodation, please contact IU Disability
Services for Students.
Statement about Academic Misconduct
University rules concerning academic misconduct will be rigorously
enforced in this class. See IU Code of Ethics, Part II for details. As a student
at IU, you are expected to adhere to the standards and policies
detailed in the Code of Student Rights, Responsibilities, and
Conduct. When you submit a paper with your name on it in this course,
you are signifying that the work contained therein is all yours,
unless otherwise cited or referenced. Any ideas or materials taken
from another source for either written or oral use must be fully
acknowledged. If you are unsure about the expectations for completing
an assignment or taking a test or exam, be sure to seek clarification
beforehand. All suspected violations of the Code will be handled
according to University policies. Sanctions for academic misconduct
may include a failing grade on the assignment, reduction in your final
grade, a failing grade in the course, among other possibilities, and
must include a report to the Dean of Students.