by Colin Allen <prof.colin.allen@gmail.com>
-- College faculty or other teachers have permission to
link to this document or reproduce it for non-commercial distribution
only. This authorship and reuse statement must be kept intact.
A Guide to Writing Philosophy Essays
If this is your first philosophy class, you may find what is expected
in your written work to be somewhat different from what is expected in
other disciplines. Even if this is not your first philosophy class,
you may find the following comments useful as a guide to what your
instructor expects. (Half the battle in any class is to figure out
what the professor expects from you.) In either case, you should read
what follows since it contains some important information and
warnings.
Chapter references below are to A. P. Martinich's Philosophical
Writing: An Introduction (2nd edition, Blackwell, 1997) where you
can find more detailed information about these topics.
Content
To be successful writing an essay you must understand the topic it
will address. Before writing anything you should make sure you
understand the topic by thinking about it carefully and discussing it
with your instructor or with other students. Your essay should be
structured around an argument or arguments relevant to the topic
(Ch3). In a short essay, it is especially important to avoid
irrelevant material. For instance, DON'T start your essay with
something like "Philosophers have been pondering the nature of truth
since the beginning of time." Get straight to the point (Ch8).
In particular, you should begin by describing the question or topic
you will address and giving some indication of your purpose (e.g., to
answer the question one way or the other, or, if not to answer it,
then to give an analysis of a particular approach to the topic). If
you are not writing a response to a particular question that your
instructor assigned, then it is also important to provide a title for
your essay.
Philosophy is concerned with arguments. You will be asked to identify
and explain the structure and content of arguments in the assigned
readings and, perhaps, to present your own arguments. If you do not
understand the relationship between premises and conclusions then find
out before you attempt the first essay (Chs 2 & 5). You might also
consider taking an introductory course in logic.
Level of Presentation
Writing assignments in a class such as this one serves two purposes.
The first, and perhaps the most important to some of you, is so that
you may be assigned a grade for the class. To this end, you are
required to demonstrate how well you understand the ideas and
arguments which have been presented. In any area, not just
philosophy, one of the best ways to find out if someone understands
something is to have them explain it to another person who is not
already familiar with the material. With this in mind, you should
imagine that you are writing your essay not for your instructor but
for an intelligent layperson, such as a friend who is not taking the
class (Ch1). (If you have a willing friend who meets this
description, it might even help to have that person read your essay
and see if they understand it.) From the perspective of the grader, a
point by point summary of your reading does not show comprehension.
You must try to highlight the logical structure of the arguments you
are presenting.
The second purpose is to teach you how to do philosophy and how to
write good philosophy papers. In the latter respect, the assigned
readings for the class may be less than perfect examples! A good
piece of philosophy consists in considering arguments, trying to think
of ways in which the argument might be challenged, and thinking of how
those challenges might be met. This requires a lot of thinking! You
cannot expect merely to paraphrase what you have read and do well in
philosophy. Once you have done the thinking, a good piece of writing
lays out the main argument and then systematically considers
challenges to the argument (Ch3). The more methodically this
is done, the easier it is for the reader to follow what is going on.
The next section contains further hints for good writing.
Clarity of Exposition
Things you can do to make your writing understandable include:
- Introduce technical terms explicitly, by means of a definition or
examples. Don't just start using them without explanation (Chs 1
& 5).
- Make sure that your sentences cannot be misconstrued because of
ambiguity or vagueness (Ch7). It is very easy to overlook
ambiguity or vagueness. Because you know what you intended the
sentence to mean when you wrote it, it is hard to reread the sentence
with an open mind. Don't expect the person who reads your essay to be
able to read your mind!
- Reread your essay sentence by sentence. Stop after every sentence
and ask yourself if it says exactly what you want it to say. If you
are not happy with a particular sentence or passage that you have
written, ask yourself why it bothers you. It could be that you don't
really understand what you are trying to say or that you don't really
believe it. If either of these is the case, you need to think some
more before writing. It really helps the rereading process if you can
allow some time between writing and rereading--in other words, start
working on your assignments well before the deadline! (But see
Martinich's Appendix.)
- Provide "signposts" for your reader. Explicitly indicate the
structure of your essay by saying how what you are writing relates to
the question you are answering. Also, be sure to indicate explicitly
when you are reporting your own view and when you are reporting
someone else's. The reader should never be left in any doubt about
whose ideas are being presented. In presenting an argument, whether
your own or someone else's, be sure to indicate which are the premises
and what is the conclusion of the argument.
- When you are trying to give an argument, don't use rhetorical
questions. Such questions are problematic on several accounts. First,
they don't make clear, unambiguous statements. Second, they invite the
disgruntled reader to disagree with you. Third, even if the reader is
inclined to agree with your general thrust, they don't provide any
reasons for doing so, so they don't count when you have been
asked to argue for a particular position.
Grammar, Spelling and Format
Bad grammar and spelling tend to distract a reader and get in the way
of your presentation. While neither grammar nor spelling will be
directly graded by the author of this document, they may affect the
grade you receive because of the psychological effect they produce in
the reader. Particularly annoying are misspellings of words that are
common in the readings, especially names. (E.g., it is "Descartes" not
"Decartes" or "Descarte"; and "argument" not "arguement".) Doubly
annoying are multiple but different misspellings of the same word.
Papers should be typed, double spaced, with a one-inch margin on all
sides and a standard font size (usually 11 or 12 points).
Citation and Plagiarism
All work should be your own, with the exception of brief
quotations that are introduced to support a particular textual
interpretation you wish to make. In other words, you should not use a
quotation unless you go on to say something directly about the passage
you quote.
You are encouraged to discuss the assignments with anyone you wish,
including other class members and your instructor. However, except
for the assigned readings, you should not need to make use of other
written materials. The object is to teach you to analyze
philosophical arguments, not to find out how good you are at library
searches.
When you write your essay, it must be entirely your own work. When
explaining an argument from a piece of assigned reading, it is not
sufficient to quote or directly paraphrase material in the text. You
must recast the material in your own words. Taking a sentence from
any source and substituting synonyms is not acceptable. Quotations
or extra sources must be clearly cited in a standard way.
There are many guides to help you avoid plagiarism, and most universities have good ones. See Google search of edu sites for examples.